Thursday, January 12, 2012

Jason Alderman: Financial Planning for Later Marriages

Couples who marry as young adults usually don't bring a lot of financial baggage to the table, aside from student loans and car payments. But what if you're getting married in your 40s, 50s or later -- after divorce, children and years of building assets have complicated your economic situation? Do you and your spouse-to-be have a game plan for how to comingle your finances?

The key is to have a frank, comprehensive conversation with your partner long before you walk down the aisle. That might well involve seeking legal and professional advice. But before you bring in the professionals to start drafting legal documents, there are a few steps you can take to better know where you stand:

First, catalog each person's preexisting assets and debts. Include assets like income from paychecks, Social Security, investment accounts, bank account balances, retirement benefits (pensions, IRAs, 401[k] plans, whole life insurance) and equity in homes, cars and other major purchases. Debts might include ongoing expenses such as child support, insurance premiums, rent or mortgage payments, credit card balances, outstanding car loans and medical bills.

Use that financial information to launch discussions about important issues such as:

  • How do you plan to share expenses and what will be your living arrangements? For example, will you maintain separate banking and investment accounts or open joint accounts? Will you move into one spouse's home and sell the other?

  • Whose medical insurance will you opt for -- your own employer's plan vs. spousal coverage?

  • How long until each of you qualifies for Medicare, and how will you pay for coverage until then?

  • How do you want your estates to be distributed? For example, how much of your pre-marriage assets should go to children from previous marriages?

Update legal documents. You'll each probably want to amend your will, financial and medical powers of attorney, life insurance policies, retirement accounts, investment funds and any other accounts where beneficiaries or people who control your health or finances are named. This could be particularly important if you want to remove a previous spouse or to reallocate who should inherit what.

Prenuptial agreement. You also might want to have your lawyer draft a prenuptial agreement (prenup) which is a written contract that outlines terms and conditions for dividing a couple's assets and financial responsibilities -- basically who gets what if you divorce or one of you dies. It's wise to settle these matters before getting married, because state laws don't always recognize postnuptial agreements.

Having a valid prenup might prevent your spouse from challenging terms of your will or preexisting trusts after you die -- sad to say, that does happen on occasion. For example, under state law, unless your prenup says otherwise, your spouse could be entitled to a specific portion of your marital assets after divorce or death, no matter what your will specifies. Laws vary from state to state, but typically your spouse could be entitled to up to one-half of marital assets in a divorce and from one-third to one-half if you die.

Retirement accounts. There are several interesting twists when it comes to bequeathing retirement accounts:

  • By federal law, you can bequeath an IRA to anyone you like, but spouses are entitled to inherit other non-IRA retirement benefits, such as 401(k) and pension plans, unless they sign away their rights.

  • Amounts accumulated in 401(k) plans during a marriage typically are considered marital property, so if you were previously divorced, the court should have divided your accounts through a qualified domestic relations order as part of the divorce settlement.

  • Division of pension benefits can be even more complicated, so make sure your attorney reviews prior divorce settlements very carefully when drafting your prenup.


A few other financial considerations to keep in mind:
  • If you were widowed, or married at least 10 years before divorcing, you can draw Social Security benefits based on your dead or former spouse's earnings, if that's more favorable than your own accumulated benefit. However, if you remarry before age 60 (50, if disabled) that option goes away. See Social Security's Survivors Benefits for details.

  • It's important to note that prenups don't supersede Medicaid rules. The government considers the combined income of both spouses when determining eligibility for receiving Medicaid benefits, including long-term nursing home care. To learn more about your own state's Medicaid program, follow the links HERE.

  • Alimony payments from ex-spouses will almost certainly end when you remarry, so factor that into your new budget.

  • Widowed spouses of public employees (including military, police, firefighters and civil servants) often lose some or all of their survivor benefits upon remarriage, so research terms of any survivor annuity or health insurance policies carefully.

  • When a widowed or divorced parent with primary custody remarries, income and assets of the new spouse may count toward the "expected family contribution" used to calculate federal student aid available through grants and subsidized loans for college.

Congratulations on finding love later in life. Don't be put off by all the important financial decisions you'll need to make together, but do be informed, so your marriage gets off on the right foot.

This article is intended to provide general information and should not be considered legal, tax or financial advice. It's always a good idea to consult a legal, tax or financial advisor for specific information on how certain laws apply to you and about your individual financial situation.

?

Follow Jason Alderman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PracticalMoney

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jason-alderman/financial-planning-late-marriages_b_1173084.html

joseph gordon levitt katy perry russell brand kevin durant rutgers mark hurd new ipad 3 baylor

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Romney wrestles with GOP attacks on corporate past (Reuters)

MANCHESTER, New Hampshire (Reuters) ? Mitt Romney is poised to take a big step toward the Republican U.S. presidential nomination on Tuesday by capturing New Hampshire, hoping to ride out last-minute attacks from his rivals and recover from a self-inflicted wound.

The former governor of neighboring Massachusetts carried a sizeable lead in polls into voting day, a sufficient cushion that should force rivals Ron Paul, Jon Huntsman, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum into a battle for second place.

Romney, 63, would be the first Republican who is not an incumbent president to win the first two early voting states, after his slim eight-vote victory over Rick Santorum a week ago in the Iowa caucuses.

A more resounding win on Tuesday would give him momentum going into South Carolina on January 21 and Florida on January 31. He leads in both states and victories there could all but sew up his nomination to face Democratic President Barack Obama in the November 6 election.

"You're going to make a big statement tomorrow, let's take it to the next step, give me the boost I need, I hope," said Romney in Bedford on Monday night at his final rally of the day.

It was unclear how much damage had been done by a mess of his own making in which Romney declared "I like being able to fire people," in addressing his desire for greater competition between health insurance companies.

His opponents, Republican and Democratic alike, quickly seized on the comment as evidence of an out-of-touch politician and coupled it with attacks over his record at Bain Capital, a firm that bought companies and restructured them.

"Governor Romney enjoys firing people. I enjoy creating jobs," Huntsman said.

In a remarkable turnaround in a party known for being friendly to business, Republicans seeking to slow Romney down sounded more like populists as they bashed Romney's work as a venture capitalist.

Gingrich, brooding over negative attacks from Romney and his backers that knocked him out of the front-runner position, has launched the toughest onslaught on Romney.

"Mitt Romney was not a capitalist during his reign at Bain. He was a predatory corporate raider," says a video produced by a pro-Gingrich group.

New Hampshire voting stations close at 7 p.m. EST (midnight GMT). About 250,000 people are expected to vote in the Republican primary while 75,000 are likely to vote to endorse Obama's re-election.

HUNTSMAN HOPING FOR 'BONANZA'

"Mitt Romney, I think he will come out on top," said voter Albert Guptill in Nashua. "By how much, I don't know, but I think he will, yeah."

But not everyone was happy about voting for him.

Eli Haykinson of Bedford said he did not want to vote for Romney but might have to because he could have the best chance to defeat Obama.

"I personally don't like his huge campaign style. You don't really get to feel him at all. I don't want to vote for him but I may have to," Haykinson said.

The Monday Suffolk University tracking poll had Romney at 33 percent, Paul 20 percent, Huntsman 13 percent, Gingrich 11 percent, Santorum 10 percent and undecided 12 percent.

Since victory looked out of reach for Romney's rivals, they were waging a fierce battle to sway undecided voters their way in the final hours and win second place.

Both libertarian Representative Paul and Huntsman, a former U.S. ambassador to China, have been on the rise in recent days.

"It could be a bonanza," Huntsman told CNN.

Former Pennsylvania Senator Santorum, who nearly won Iowa by appealing to social conservatives, has found that his message in New Hampshire is not attracting the same surge of support.

He and Texas Governor Rick Perry, along with Gingrich, are looking to South Carolina to challenge Romney as his conservative alternative.

Romney leads there for now but Gingrich backers have launched $3.4 million worth of ads in South Carolina to try to slow him down in the conservative state.

(Additional reporting by Ros Krasny, Sam Youngman, Jason McLure and Mary Milliken; editing by Mohammad Zargham)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/gop/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20120110/ts_nm/us_usa_campaign

moonshine jay z and beyonce the big chill tony blankley steelers blue ivy carter pittsburgh steelers

Monetary policy works when rates near zero: Bullard (Reuters)

Chicago (Reuters) ? Central bank actions work better than tax and spending measures to protect an economy from shocks, even when interest rates are at rock bottom levels, St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard said on Saturday.

"Monetary policy has been quite effective, even when the policy rate has been near zero," he said in remarks to an economics conference.

"It is not necessary, or desirable to turn to fiscal stabilization policy."

The Fed cut rates to near zero more than three years ago and has bought $2.3 trillion in bonds to spur growth. Some officials want it to buy more mortgage-backed bonds to boost flagging housing markets.

Despite signs the economic recovery is gaining momentum, many economist including ones at the Fed forecast sluggish growth and high unemployment through 2012. The Fed is expected to announce later this month projections that will show the benchmark fed funds rate is likely to stay near zero into 2014.

Bullard said that after the Fed cut interest rates to near zero, many people assumed that fiscal policies would be better tools to protect the economy from outside shocks. He said he would be publishing a paper that would disagree with that view.

"Stabilization policy should be left to the monetary authority," he said. "Fiscal authorities should set the tax and spending programs in such a way that makes economic and political sense for the medium to longer term."

(Reporting By Mark Felsenthal; Editing by Andrea Ricci)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/economy/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20120107/bs_nm/us_usa_fed_bullard

steelers vs ravens jack dempsey lake malawi warren jeffs phaedra parks oklahoma earthquake new madrid fault

cmiller237: When will Google+ replace Facebook? #socialmedia http://t.co/utxysCxp

  • Passer la navigation
  • Twitter sur votre mobile ? Cliquez ici m.twitter.com!
  • Passer cette ?tape
  • Connexion
Loader Twitter.com
  • Connexion
When will Google+ replace Facebook? #socialmedia ow.ly/8mGT9 cmiller237

Colleen Miller

Pied de page

Source: http://twitter.com/cmiller237/statuses/156408726503424000

beverly hills hotel beverly hills hotel tori spelling duke basketball brian williams patrice o neal patrice o neal

6 airports you don't want to get stuck in

Carlos Ortiz / Getty Images

A traveler sleeps on a baggage carousel at Chicago's Midway Airport after flights were canceled during a December 2005 snowstorm.

By Sascha Segan, Frommers.com

Many airports are awful. Some are lovely, like the 10 prettiest airport terminals we profiled last week. But most are at best joyless econoboxes, at worst purgatorial warehouses of stalled lives.

Some airports deserve special condemnation, though. In some cases, they deserve to be literally condemned. Assembling this top 10 list of misfits, I scanned professional surveys and delay statistics and asked my frequent-traveler friends to come up with the 10 airports where you'd least like to spend an extra hour.

I'm sticking to major airports here. There are small airports around the world that consist of a shanty that swelters in the summer and freezes in the winter, with a hole in the wall for baggage claim and a single sad concession stand. (I'm actually describing my experience at Udaipur Airport in India in 1999.) But that's not fair. These 10 airports should deliver better service, and they don't.?

Frommers.com slideshow: More tragic terminals

Chicago Midway Airport
Chicago's Midway airport ranked as the nation's worst for on-time departures in the most recent federal Bureau of Transportation Statistics data, earning it a spot on this list. It isn't a bad place to hang out, with a new food court and a frequent subway connection to downtown Chicago, but any airport is the worst airport if you're stuck there and you aren't getting on a plane.

Consider this the least-worst of our set of bad airports. Midway's curse may come more from Chicago's notoriously difficult weather than from any problem the airport itself can fix.

"Paris" Beauvais Airport, France
A solid fifty miles north of Paris, this depressing low-cost box of an airport in Picardy got saddled with a bait-and-switch name by Ryanair, the ultimate bait-and-switch airline. It rated as one of the world's worst airports by Frommers.com friends SleepingInAirports.net because of its lack of seating, lack of services, and general half-tent, half-warehouse atmosphere.

It lacks a rail link to Paris and closes overnight, so hope that your flight doesn't get too delayed, or you may be camping out on the lawn.

LaGuardia Airport US Airways Terminal, New York City
I don't hate LaGuardia, but it was recently rated the worst major airport in America by both JD Power and Associates and Zagat Survey, so who am I to argue?

LaGuardia has no rail link to anywhere -- even between its own terminals -- and regularly suffers from congestion, overcrowding, and delays. While its terminals are shaping up, they're still each smaller and with fewer services than you'd expect from an airport at one of the top tourist destinations in the world.

I'm giving the US Airways Terminal the worst-terminal award here because at least the central terminal has an atrium and the Delta terminal just got some new food options. The US Airways terminal is dull and sad.

Moscow Sheremtyevo Airport Terminal B/C, Russia
One of the two airports rated "two stars" by global consulting firm Skytrax (nobody got one star), SVO B/C got particularly bad marks for anything where you have to interact with airport staff: their attitude, their language skills, and the speed with which they process passengers.?

Reviewers suggest that you brush up on your Russian if you intend to transfer flights, because signboards and staff tend not to work in English. Apparently, you can fix up a Russian airport, but it's harder to fix up Russian customer service. (In capitalist Russia, customer services you!)

Depressingly, SVO Terminal B/C is partially a new terminal, but it still got one or two-star rankings from Skytrax on "leisure facilities," "baggage hall," and "meet and greet." It's also several miles away from the rest of the airport and from its rail station, making inter-terminal connections difficult. Air France cautions "Take official claims of short transfer times with a pinch of salt: delays of up to two hours have been reported."

Manila Airport Terminal 1, Philippines
Last May, the ceiling at Manila airport's Terminal 1 caved in, injuring two people. That's part of why Sleeping in Airports rated it the world's worst terminal last year.

"The terminal has been a frequent target of criticism with travellers and the business community complaining it is congested, run-down and filthy, with toilets that do not work," Agence France Presse commented. According to SleepingInAirports.net, bribery and theft are also rampant in the terminal.

The negative press attention seems to have had some effect; this November the Philippine government said it would renovate the terminal starting in January. It looks like changes can't come too soon.

JFK Airport Terminal 3, New York City
In 1960, Pan American Airlines built the Worldport: a grand, flying-saucer-shaped gateway to the Jet Age.

Fifty one years later, this decrepit, crumbling chunk of concrete is still used by Delta as an international hub. Terminal 3 is the worst single airport terminal in America, and probably in the Western world. Even Delta acknowledges this: they're tearing it down and replacing it with a giant glass structure connected to the nearby Terminal 4. It's unsalvageable.

Terminal 3 is known for endless immigration lines in a dank basement, for an utter lack of food and shopping options, three crowded and confusing entry points, hallways that could have been designed by M.C Escher and for vomiting international travelers out onto an underground sidewalk with no cabs available. There's also a sense that the cleaning crew gave up in despair a while ago.

JFK's terminals range from the awful to the mediocre, but Delta's hubs take the rotten, worm-infested cake. Right next to T3 there's Terminal 2, an ugly box with an undermanned security line where I really hope you're never caught hungry.

More from Frommers.com

?

?

Source: http://overheadbin.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/12/28/9773678-6-airports-you-dont-want-to-get-stuck-in

tim gunn death clock death clock cerebral palsy lenny dykstra top chef texas stanley tucci

Video: Secrets in a Small Town, Part 5

Dateline NBC

'Dateline NBC,' the signature broadcast for NBC News in primetime, premiered in 1992. Since then, it has been pioneering a new approach to primetime news programming. The multi-night franchise, supplemented by frequent specials, allows NBC to consistently and comprehensively present the highest-quality reporting, investigative features, breaking news coverage and newsmaker profiles.

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032600/vp/45903962#45903962

occupy los angeles occupy los angeles comedian patrice o neal occupy philadelphia occupy philadelphia conrad murray conrad murray

Monday, January 9, 2012

IRS estimate: 17 percent of taxes owed went unpaid (AP)

WASHINGTON ? People and businesses underpaid their taxes by an estimated 17 percent in the most recent year studied, failing to send the government a massive $450 billion that it was owed, according to an Internal Revenue Service report released Friday.

The study covered 2006, the most recent data the IRS said was available. The amount of underpaid taxes far exceeded the size of the entire federal budget deficit at the time.

After IRS audits and other enforcement efforts, non-compliance in 2006 shrank to 14 percent. That left the final amount of unpaid taxes at $385 billion, the agency said.

Friday's report immediately became fodder for lawmakers arguing that any effort to overhaul the tax code ? which seems a long-shot in an election year ? must include closing the gap between what is owed and actually paid.

"The best way to increase compliance is to reform the tax code to make it simpler," said Michelle Dimarob, spokeswoman for House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp, R-Mich. She said that would cause fewer errors and "greater certainty, which is key to job creation."

"In an era when we're squeezing the federal budget for every dollar of savings, we have to make every effort to recover these lost funds," said Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont.

By either measure, the total of unpaid taxes in 2006 was larger than that fiscal year's budget deficit of $248 billion. Federal fiscal years begin in October of the previous year.

Federal deficits have since mushroomed out of control, hitting a record $1.4 trillion in 2009 and barely receding to $1.3 trillion last year. President Barack Obama and Republicans in Congress have agreed to some spending cuts but have remained deadlocked over how to curb the gigantic budget shortfalls that are projected indefinitely.

Altogether, the IRS estimates it was owed nearly $2.7 trillion in taxes in 2006.

The agency said that out of the $450 billion taxpayers underpaid that year, the largest share ? an estimated $376 billion ? came from underreporting of income.

The IRS pointedly noted that compliance increases when third parties like employers report income information to the government and when they withhold taxes that are owed.

The report said that with wage and salary information reported to the IRS on W-2 forms, only 1 percent of that income was misreported. But an estimated 56 percent of income was underreported when the government requires little or no information, such as income earned by some small businesses, renters and businesses selling property.

The IRS has made efforts to improve compliance, such as increasing oversight of professional tax return preparers and increasing the information that must be reported to the agency by stock brokers, mutual fund companies and for some business transactions.

Even so, tax analysts said there was no reason to believe that today's compliance rate has changed significantly from the 2006 figures.

That is chiefly because significant portions of the underpaid taxes are believed to come from businesses and individuals who report information about their income that is difficult for the IRS to verify.

"It's hard to get to that," said Clint Stretch, a tax policy expert for Deloitte Tax LLP. "Nobody wants a bunch of IRS police hammering on small business people."

John Buckley, a Georgetown University law professor and former Democratic congressional tax aide, said that if IRS budget cuts continue, "It's quite probable we'll see a decline in compliance rates."

The IRS's roughly $12 billion budget was reduced by about $300 million this year.

The overall 2006 compliance rates were roughly similar to 2001, the last year the IRS had examined.

In that year, 16 percent of taxes were unpaid initially, while enforcement efforts lowered the non-compliance rate to 13 percent.

That meant that in 2001, $345 billion in taxes were uncollected initially and $290 billion remained unpaid even after IRS audits and other enforcement efforts.

"Despite increasing complexity and an ever-changing tax code, compliance has remained steady," said IRS spokesman Frank Keith.

The dollar amounts of unpaid taxes were larger in 2006 chiefly because the size of the economy and the amount of taxes owed had grown, agency officials said.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/topstories/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120106/ap_on_bi_ge/us_irs_unpaid_taxes

minnesota vikings packers vs vikings packers vs vikings randall cobb packers score google x lisfranc injury